The U.S. online gambling landscape shifted dramatically this week as leading operators signaled a strategic pivot toward prediction markets, while tighter global regulation and national laws are reshaping the business models of crypto casinos and traditional online gaming platforms.
DraftKings and FanDuel announced moves away from some industry trade alignments to pursue prediction-market products that trade on outcomes ranging from sports to elections, a step that could redraw the regulatory map for online wagering. The shift, made public on November 19, 2025, follows corporate filings and press statements revealing new product launches and partnerships as the companies seek growth outside state-regulated sports betting markets. “Prediction markets allow different regulatory pathways and broader market access,” one industry analyst said, noting that such markets are overseen at the federal level by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission rather than state gaming commissions. The departures are stirring debate about consumer protection, taxation and market integrity in an already fast-evolving sector. The Washington Post reported on the moves and the companies’ rationale today.
Crypto casinos face tightened oversight worldwide
Across the Atlantic and in offshore licensing hubs, regulators have been tightening standards for crypto-based gaming. In October 2025, Curaçao’s overhaul of its licensing regime and subsequent re-registration deadlines forced hundreds of operators to adapt to stricter anti-money-laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) requirements, accelerating an industry-wide migration toward stronger compliance and on-chain auditability. Regulators in Malta and other European jurisdictions have issued new directives requiring blockchain analytics and enhanced transaction monitoring for token wagers, pushing many operators to adopt identity-linked crypto rails or risk losing market access.
The net effect: some decentralized, no-KYC platforms lost market share or retooled to offer hybrid fiat-crypto rails with mandatory KYC for larger deposits, while others marketed provably fair, auditable smart-contract games to retain trust. Industry sources say the regulatory changes are fragmenting the market — raising costs for operators but tightening consumer safeguards.
National laws and tax policy are shifting business calculations
Policy changes and proposed tax measures in major markets are adding pressure on operators’ margins and strategic choices. In India, the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, enacted earlier in 2025 and effective October 1, established a federal framework for licensing and consumer protections that has already altered market entrants’ strategies. Meanwhile in the UK, political debate over slot taxation and shop closures has focused attention on how taxation and licensing reforms could reshape both retail and online operators’ economics.
For U.S.-facing platforms, the DraftKings and FanDuel moves underscore a broader challenge: state-by-state regulation of sports betting remains fragmented, and new product forms like prediction markets or tokenized wagering could skirt some state restrictions while raising federal oversight questions. Market participants warn of legal uncertainty: “Operators can chase addressable markets, but they also invite regulatory scrutiny if they cross jurisdictional lines,” said a compliance executive at a major operator.
What to watch next
Expect three storylines to dominate in the coming months: (1) regulatory pushback or rulemaking from the CFTC and state gaming regulators about prediction markets, (2) implementation timelines and enforcement actions tied to Curaçao and EU directives that will determine which crypto casinos survive or transform, and (3) fiscal and licensing policy debates in major markets — from U.S. states to the UK and India — that will influence where operators invest and what products they roll out.
As operators retool product portfolios and compliance teams, consumers and regulators will be watching whether new market forms deliver greater transparency and safety or simply shift risk across jurisdictions.
